The previous evening I had advised The Chauffeur that our next
two days were sorted, to which he responded, “Do they include Wimbledon and
Richmond Park?”
Well actually, no, they did not, and I should have
acknowledged that the reason we were camped back in London, albeit Greater
London and on the western edge, was to “sop” up the must-do attractions we had
not managed to visit over the last three years. Soon after our arrival
this time, we had made the effort to visit Lord’s Cricket Ground which was on
Chris’s wish list, as was The Oval and Wimbledon. These should come as no
surprise to anyone who knows my husband, or even if you have followed this blog
over all the years we have been on the road; his armchair sportsman
appreciation is without dispute. And there is nothing like visiting the real
thing!
After checking out Wimbledon on line, I learned that the tours
were in hot demand and we would not be able to book a spot until Friday, which
is what we duly did. The backstop was Richmond Park which had actually been on
my wish list, a desire sparked by seeing so many wonderful painted scenes of
London painted from this spot, not least by the great J W Turner.
So yesterday morning, with lunch packed in the eski once
more, we headed downstream of the River Thames, on the route taken to Hampton
Court Palace two days before, pressing on to Richmond. I had hijacked the plan
to the extent of detouring to Ham House and Garden, a National Trust property
conveniently placed for inclusion into the day’s agenda.
Alas, as we arrived, we noted the sign advising the property
was closed to the public from Monday 4 June to Thursday 7 June, a fact I would
have discovered earlier had I gone on-line. Instead I had relied on our paper
based library; the National Trust bible and our Rough Guide of England. Silly
me!
In fact a little further research revealed that the First Floor of the House had been closed the week before as well, to allow for a film crew to set up for the filming that was happening this week. This, of course, then raised the question: what was being filmed? The answer was not immediately forthcoming.
The 10,000 acre Lee Valley Park, also within the boundaries
of Greater London and visited by us last year,
is larger, however Richmond holds several other comparative statistics;
it is half the size of Madrid’s Casa de
Campo and around three times the size of New York’s Central Park.
There are reputedly about one hundred species of birds on
site, although the skylark population has diminished hugely over the last five
years; the reason for this being the dogs running out of control all over the
park, rather than being kept on short leads as requested.
Outside the enclosure, we made our way along paths
through bracken, softer and greener than that at home, startling a couple of
fallow deer who scampered ahead for some way, and rabbits out of the
undergrowth. Squirrels were everywhere and always an absolute delight.
We were wary of the ticks that live here amongst the
vegetation. Signs everywhere warn of the dangers of these little creatures and
the Lyme Disease they spread to humans, and so they should be. We spoke to one
dog owner whose dog was leaping happily about as he apparently does every day;
the routine that follows is a tick removal exercise and there are always plenty
to be plucked away.
There were also signs warning walkers against picking
mushrooms, toadstools and chestnuts; the first because of the special
scientific significance of the funghi and the second because the deer
population have a greater need for these than the would-be poacher.
We were so taken with the park that we drove another circuit of the road just inside the boundary, marvelling at the number of walkers, cyclists, runners and deer there were and at the wonderful treasure this is to London, especially given that there is no charge for parking. Full of such joys, we wove our way back through the Kingston towns of Wimbledon and Esher, past the Sandown racing park, through Weybridge and Shepperton, reaching our lovely little camp beside the river by the middle of the afternoon and just minutes before a heavy afternoon shower.
Inside the hallowed gates of Wimbledon, we were
directed to the museum, an excellent affair full of history and information,
displayed with class and expertise, interactive and otherwise. My only critism
might be that there was a fair bit of audio going on and it was a little hard
to focus on any one exhibit, although I suspect that had more to do with the
drama of finding our way here.
At 11 am, we joined forty other tourists and were
guided around the complex, today very much a working site in preparation for the
two week Championships just over a month away. We enjoyed our tour of the Rod Laver
Stadium in Melbourne a few years back, but on some levels this was even better,
although we were not taken down into the dressing rooms or along the corridor
through the members' area. But then this is a very different set up to that in
Melbourne, albeit the location of one of the four Grand Slams and has grass
courts as opposed to the “hard” or clay of the other three. Our guide, a
passionate tennis fan, was informative, articulate and excellent. All of which
simply explains that even I, not a sports follower at all, found much to enjoy
as well.
The All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club,was
founded in 1868 and first located off Worple Road in Wimbledon. Tennis has its
roots in royal or real tennis which we have seen played at
Lords Cricket Ground and Hampton Court Palace, lawn tennis evolving in the mid
1870s. The Wimbledon Championship started in 1877, although at that point it
was for men playing singles only. But a mere seven years later, women were
included which was really quite forward of the Club.
By 1922, the Club had moved to its current location in
Church Road and the rest is history. Courts have been modified and modernised
over the years, and the facilities for members, players and specatators have
been improved, but tradition is the catch cry of the Club and changes are slow
to come.
After the tour, we exited the main gates and headed up
the hill, through Wimbledon village and down the hill to the township of
Wimbledon. On our return we were guided by signs, something we could have done
with when we left our car park. Of course finding the car was another issue,
however I remembered a few landmarks and we were back within our parking allowance.
Although the afternoon was well underway, we decided to
return to Ham House the other side of Richmond Park and see what we had missed
yesterday. The house is quite impressive, or at least viewed in its setting
beside the River Thames. Today it is presented as it was in the 17th
century and is decorated with a substantial collection of paintings, furniture and
textiles of the day, those during the reign of Charles I and II.
Unfortunately the film crew had not cleared their work
space on the first floor so our exploration was limited to the ground floor and
the basement. As with all stately homes, the blinds are drawn in all the rooms
and many of these decorated in dark and sombre tones do nothing to lift the
spirits. Each room was guarded by an earnest and mature National Trust guide,
and it was quite stifling to be so engaged on entry with no space to independently
explore. I do appreciate that the “policing” of the property is paramount for
conservation purposes, but there must be a happy medium.
I did ask after the filming and learned only that it was
for a feature film and not the first time this had happened, but no further
detail was forthcoming.
Ham House was built in 1610 by Sir Thomas Vavasour, Knight
Marshall to James I, then a more modest construction than was to come. Ten years
later when Vavasour died, the house was
granted to John Ramsay, 1st Earl of Holderness until his death six years after
that.
It was then that the house was handed over, by lease, to
William Murray, whipping boy and close childhood friend of Charles I. Ownership
did become complete over the following years, and the property remained in the
family right until it was handed over to the National Trust in 1948 to settle
death duties.
Today we learned a little about Elizabeth, Murray’s eldest
daughter, who married Lionel Tollemache, 3rd Baronet of Helmingham Hall.
Ham House became their primary residence after Murray was exiled to France
during the scuffles of the time.
It was this same Elizabeth who was quite a herbalist,
experimenting with all kinds of potions and lotions, many in an attempt to
alleviate the gout she and one of her husbands suffered. One of the ointment recipes
contained pulverised elder leaves and pig fat, and a medicine to relieve the
same included “a quart of worms and a peck of garden snails”.
Needless to say our visit was most interesting and we were glad
we had bothered to battle the traffic to get there, and later to find our way
home, although if we had to paid for our entry, rather than flash our
membership card, we may well have felt short changed. In all fairness one of
the guides did suggest we revisit when the whole house was fully reopened.
No comments:
Post a Comment